• Home
  • The Project
  • People
  • Project News
  • Publications
  • Contact Us
  • Links

 

 

Project Methodology and Approach

 

The project will comprise five separate but interlocking modules:

Module 1 (months 0-26) will coordinate activities for all the modules, ensuring methodological consistency, timely completion, effective communication and exchange between researchers and the dissemination of project findings. An Advisory Panel has been convened in order to bring together a group of international experts in the biosecurity and forestry fields who are receiving regular briefings on the progress of the research and early drafts of research papers and other outputs. 

Marked for destruction. Infected elms in 2008
 
 

Module 2 (months 0-10) has launched the research and is developing the historical and international comparative dimension of the work by focussing on the DED outbreak and assessing its relevance to SOD and other contemporary tree disease events. Forest Research has had an active research programme relating to DED since the initial outbreak in 1969 and a great deal of data and expertise has been accumulated which is being made available to the project.  Following an initial period of archival research and literature review, we have to date conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with a range of Forestry Commission officers, pathologists and local authority tree officers involved in monitoring and reporting on the outbreak.

1970's poster from the East Sussex elm control zone. Click here for further adventures of Elm man and Barkboy!
 We will also be undertaking an equivalent set of interviews will be conducted with key people in Defra's Plant Health Division and the Forestry Commission's Plant Health Service, as well as with stakeholders such as the National Trust and the Horticultural Trades Association in order to assess the risk posed by SOD. We are asking question such as how do these disease systems compare in terms of pathways of transmission, the nature of their environmental impact and their manageability in biosecurity terms? What can other country experience with SOD, particularly in the United States, tell us about the possible impact of SOD in the UK, its trajectory of spread, the nature of the response from government agencies and the effectiveness of attempted eradication measures?
 

Module 3 (months 2-18) integrates this background analysis of DED and SOD with an understanding of the biology and pathology of the disease systems concerned in order to map the rate and extent of spread for England (and Wales) on a 1 km grid. The majority of this work will be conducted within a bespoke spatial modelling environment with the objective of describing/predicting the incidence of the two diseases and their actual (DED) or likely (SOD) rate of spread.

Simulation of epidemic spread within a heterogeneous landscape
 

The first model run has produced baseline maps showing cumulative impact and cumulative risk assuming no human intervention to contain or manage the disease. We are currently working on a second set of model runs which aim to build in assumptions and demonstrate the likely consequences of range of possible actions that could have been taken by government and various stakeholders in relation to DED or might future be taken to manage the risk due to SOD. Using outputs from this work, we are currently identifying up to 4 study sites within which to develop visualisations of the actual or likely landscape impacts of these DED and SOD scenarios. These visualisations will be form the basis for the economic valuation stage of the work; 

 
 
 

Module 4 (months 10-18) comprises the economic estimation and evaluation component of the project, designed to quantify the potential non-market benefits that accrue when tree disease epidemics are prevented or brought under control. Using a stated preference approach, we will be delivering a pre-tested questionnaire to up to 2000 randomly selected individuals resident in the study areas in order to explore what people are willing to pay for measures designed to compensate for the landscape impact of DED or to prevent the predicted loss of landscape quality and visual amenity that might be expected to follow a major outbreak of SOD. 

Phytophthora ramorum: The future for beech?
 
 
 

Module 5 (months 18-26) will draw this sequence of ex post and ex ante analyses of the biology, landscape impact and cost benefit implications together to explore the policy learning and contingency planning implications of the work. Rather than convening focus groups at this point, however, we wish to use more innovative participatory methods in order to bring policymakers, stakeholders and the researchers on the project together to reflect on the experience of an historical event and to identify lessons for the future. 

Sympatric beech and rhododendron, an unfortunate combination

We will be convening a two day jury-style enquiry into DED and the biosecurity issues surrounding SOD which will be designed to receive evidence based on the research findings and then to reach a series of 'verdicts' concerning

(a) the management of the DED outbreak and the lessons that can be learned in terms of quarantine measures, monitoring, early warning, risk communication and subsequent management of the disease outbreak, and 

(b) the extent and manageability of the risk posed to landscape and biodiversity in the UK from SOD and other tree diseases.